GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

Free Online Articles Directory

Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles

Publish Article

0 && $ .browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($ .browser.version);
if(ie_version Login

Login via

My Home
Sign Out



Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > Finance > Loans > GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

GOP, Lobbyists Mount Criticism of Bill to Overhaul Student Loans

Posted: Oct 06, 2009 |Comments: 0


The Democratic-led House of Representatives, in a 253 to 171 vote on September 17, easily passed landmark legislation that would bring an end to the long-standing Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP), the program initiated by the Higher Education Act of 1965 to offer college students federally guaranteed student loans via private lenders.

As the measure awaits a Senate vote scheduled for October 15, representatives for the FFELP student loan industry along with prominent Republicans have been stepping up their attack on the key mandates of the bill, which they say will not only cost students and schools the competitive pricing and choices in student loans offered by the private sector but will saddle taxpayers with billions of dollars in new costs.

Federal Student Loans: FFELP vs. Direct Loans

Under the existing FFEL program, the government pays private FFELP lenders a subsidy for the federal student loans these lenders originate — in essence, paying a third party to act as a middleman in issuing government student loans.

In 1992, the Clinton administration launched a second federal student loan program — the Federal Direct Student Loan Program — which issues federal college loans directly to borrowers through the U.S. Department of Education, with no third-party involvement from a bank or other FFELP lender.

Should the House-approved bill, known as the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009 (SAFRA), pass the Senate and become law, the FFEL program will be dismantled and all federal student loans will become Federal Direct loans, made directly through the federal government rather than through third-party FFELP lenders and banks.

Supporters of the legislation say that the elimination of FFELP subsidies will generate  billion in savings to taxpayers over the next decade. The bill allocates  billion of this estimated savings to expand the federal Pell Grant program for low-income college students and to fund several other education initiatives at what supporters say is no additional cost to taxpayers.

President Obama has been a vocal backer of the bill, maintaining that FFELP subsidies funnel government money to banks and away from students.

“Ending this unwarranted subsidy for big banks is a no-brainer for folks everywhere,” Obama said in a recent speech at Hudson Valley Community College in New York.

Critics: Talk of Student Loan “Savings” Ignores Obvious Costs

Critics of the SAFRA measure, however, are challenging this much-publicized “ billion in savings” figure. In a piece for The Hill, Representative John Kline from Minnesota, ranking Republican on the Education and Labor Committee, argued that the projected  billion in savings ignores long-term, standard risks, failing to allow for interest-rate fluctuations and default risks on college loans.

The purported savings, holds Kline, “are in large measure actually new earnings the federal government will take in from student loan borrowers paying the government a higher interest rate than the government’s cost of funds” (“Student Lending Faces Government Takeover,”, Sept. 14, 2009).

Since borrowers’ interest rates on federal parent and student loans are fixed, as market interest rates rise from their current recession lows, the government’s cost to fund direct student loans will rise while earned borrower interest remains the same — meaning that the projected savings (that is, in Kline’s view, “earnings”) will shrink.

The anticipated cash flows to the government on which the savings figure is based will also be much more constricted if defaults are higher than projected — and default rates in the Federal Direct Student Loan Program will surge, say critics.

FFELP lenders have traditionally serviced a higher percentage of community college and career college students than the Direct Loan Program. These students tend toward higher default rates on their college loans, regardless of whether they are FFELP or Federal Direct borrowers. As the Education Department takes on more borrowers from community and career colleges, the argument goes, the Direct Loan Program will also be absorbing these borrowers’ higher tendency to default on their student loans, which would eat into the projected  billion.

Additionally, Kline notes that the SAFRA bill only covers the cost of some of its proposed education spending for five years, after which taxpayers will be facing either program cuts or increased taxes in order to continue funding these new and expanded education initiatives. Moreover, Kline revealed in his piece for The Hill, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has recently acknowledged that the proposed Pell Grant expansion will actually cost .4 billion more than originally projected — an amount that isn’t covered by the current  billion allocation within the student loan bill.

Retrieved from “”

(ArticlesBase SC #1308941)

Start increasing your traffic today just by submitting articles with us, click here to get started.
Liked this article? Click here to publish it on your website or blog, it’s free and easy!

Jeff Mictabor
About the Author:

Shelley Higsley is an enthusiast on the topics of college life issues. She has been writing for the past 5 years for a variety of education publications. She now offers her writing services on a freelance basis.

Questions and Answers

Ask our experts your Loans related questions here…


200 Characters left

What are current student loan rates?
What are federal student loan limits?
I’d like to get a payday loan then pay back when i get my student loan on november 8 th of 2010, is this possible. i’m getting over 3,000 back and can provide a statement from the college

Rate this Article


0 vote(s)




0) {
ch_selected = Math.floor(Math.random()*ch_queries.length);
if(ch_selected == ch_queries.length) ch_selected–;
ch_query = ch_queries[ch_selected];
ch_query = document.title;


Article Tags:
student loans, college loans, education loans, obama, direct loan, ffelp, safra

Related Articles

Latest Loans Articles
More from Jeff Mictabor

When It Comes to Student Loans, Forget Everything You Knew

As you get your children ready for the college admissions process, you may be wondering what all the financial aid fuss is about.

Jeff Mictaborl

Personal Financel
Oct 01, 2010

Unemployed Cash Loans – Cash Aid For The Jobless People

Unemployed cash loans are short term loans offered to people who are either not employed or are getting very low salary. The rate of interest applicable on such loans is generally higher as compared to other loans.

Onner Smithl

Jul 04, 2011

Pages: 1 2

Comments are closed.

Career coaching is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache